Twenty year has passed since
liberalization of the Nepali economy. Breaking barriers for private sector have
supported thousands of household to graduate to the middle class, but at the
same time socio-economic inequality have increased and millions of citizen
fighting for day to day basic necessities of life has been largely ignored. Judging by social and economic
challenges faced by our country in the past twenty years, it is certain that
the time has come for `the democratization of social entrepreneurship in Nepal.
Social entrepreneurship is defined as- an innovative entrepreneurial approaches
to tackle most pressing social and environmental challenges of the society.
Rather than waiting for the government to meet its mandate and fix the problem.
Social entrepreneur find out the unmet need, address the need by reinventing
the existing system, scale the solution and help catalyze the solution in a different
geographic settings. They generate social values as well as equitable financial
returns.
In Nepal, approximately 55
percent of the population lives less the $1.25 dollar a day.
Majority of the Nepali citizens are deprived of basic necessities like adequate access to finance, healthcare, education, alternative energy, drinking water, and food security. Nepal provides enormous opportunity for social entrepreneurs to use their intellectual capital, business acumen, and a passion to make a difference to tackle these challenges, at the same time making marginal profit. Addressing the challenges using economically self-sustaining business models will not just deliver durable solutions but will also support job creation and income generation.
Majority of the Nepali citizens are deprived of basic necessities like adequate access to finance, healthcare, education, alternative energy, drinking water, and food security. Nepal provides enormous opportunity for social entrepreneurs to use their intellectual capital, business acumen, and a passion to make a difference to tackle these challenges, at the same time making marginal profit. Addressing the challenges using economically self-sustaining business models will not just deliver durable solutions but will also support job creation and income generation.
Despite Nepal’s untapped entrepreneurial
potential enlistment in the social entrepreneurship space has been very discouraging. Nepal
has also failed to capitalize on business tools and technology proven and test
by our southern neighbor, which has emerged as a hotbed for sustainable, scalable
and frugal innovation. Cumbersome regulations and never ending political
bickering has created an environment where rent seeking entrepreneurism (those
that fuel consumerisms) are much more appealing then social and productive
entrepreneurism (those that supports economic growth) for aspiring and existing
entrepreneurs. Great extent of work is needed to democratize social
entrepreneurship in Nepal and cross sector collaborative effort will be
instrumental to kindle the momentum.
Private sector and Non-government organization (NGOs) needs to synergize to
build social entrepreneurship supporting eco-system. The objective of this
cross section collaboration should be to actually build capacity and generate income
among the deprived population, not simply extract wealth in the form of increasing
consumer spending.
Private sectors should not treat
social entrepreneurship merely as a corporate social responsibility stint or a
deprived sector lending obligation. Serving the low income communities should
not be seen as burden but rather as an economic opportunity. Private sector
needs to embed inclusive capitalism as a part their core business strategy. Serving
the customers in the uncharted areas will require businesses to reinvent their
existing model around new product, distribution channels and pricing mechanism.
Currently, private sector are reluctant to foray in the rural areas, primary
because of high sunk cost ,lack of
relevant human resources and various local level political risk .There
is a possibilities for the private sector to hedge the cost and risks associated by leveraging the existing relationship
with local partners and communities of a NGOs operating in the area .
For example, If a commercial bank headquartered in Kathmandu wants to increase
the outreach of its services in the semi urban and rural in the far west, but
is apprehensive of the about the capital expenditure cost it will incur, then
the bank could partner with a local NGO working in the area of financial
inclusion to deliver its product and services. The local NGO will act as a business
correspondent for the commercial bank. Business Correspondents, will be the intermediary equipped with “mini
ATMs” helping customers in rural areas to access
formal banking services such as cash
deposits, withdrawals, remittances and balance enquiries from anywhere in the
far flung areas, similar to the services
provided by ATM facilities available to
customers in urban areas. The partnership between the commercial bank and the
financial inclusion focused NGO generate mutual competitive advantage.
Commercial bank gets access to potentially profitable enterprise opportunities
where as the NGOs increases socially benefited outcome of improving financial
inclusiveness. More than 50000 NGOs and 50 % mobile phone penetration in the country
gives a huge opportunity for the private sector to leverage NGOs and technology
as a cost effective platform to deliver essential services like education,
healthcare, and banking to the underserved population .NGOs and technology
platform can also serve as an intermediary for rural entrepreneur and farmers
to find access to market to less there produce.
To their credit, in recent years
some NGOs, working in the area of sustainable private sector development have worked hard to adapt social
entrepreneurships as their operating model and have explore the opportunity to
partner with private sector to develop
self-sustaining but yet scalable business
model to fulfill their
organization objective. However, many NGOs has limited the democratization of
social entrepreneurships to churning out glossy report and expense workshops
often with a title like Value Chain Analysis of a certain product or/ and Role
of inclusiveness business in the economic development of Nepal. One thing is
for certain if the “business as usual” continues in the NGOs then many will run
out of donors funding. In the wake of the global financial crisis, many large
donor countries are facing fiscal austerity and are rethinking their approaches
to foreign aid. Increasing number of donor countries like US, UK and Germany
have started pilot programs that pivot their assistant to developing countries
from grants/aid to Impact investments in social enterprises. Also in recent
years, many social impact measuring tools like Randomize Control Trial and Global
Impact Investing Reporting Standards has been materialized, these tools have
the capacity and capability to penetrate well written annual reports and
spreadsheets to separate facts from fiction.
For NGOs to be compatible and synchronize with
the continuously changing foreign aid and global capitalism landscape, they
need to play a vital role as a bridge that combine best of markets with best of
traditional aid. They need to build a strong eco-system that encourages entrepreneurial
culture by leveraging their local embeddness, social infrastructure and
expertise. NGOs’ source of capital is primary philanthropy; they have little or
no obligation to return their capital to the donor. This nature of its
capital allow NGO’s to have more risk
appetite to experiment with social entrepreneurialism in high capital
expenditure remote areas compared to commercial investors. NGOs should support
market development and seed stage innovation, which could later be scaled using
private sector capital and business skills.
For the social entrepreneurship
to democratize in Nepal, synergy needs to create between the private sector and
the non-for profit sector. Leader of both the sector needs to move beyond the
obsolete argument of Market vs. Aid. Converge
between these two sectors in the coming years could help support inclusive
economic development of the country.
1 comment:
hey Shabda Gyawali, good work!!! good to know whats going on with Nepal's economy.
I didn't find any places to ask you question (It would be great if you add "Questions" sections, so that reader can ask you questions). So i used your comment section.
here is my question:
what do you think the future of "Kirana Pasals" in like 10-20 years from now? Do you think departmental stores like bhatbheteni or Bigmart or some other (bigstores) will grow like walmarts (or replace "Kirana Pasals" in long run)??
I really appreciate it if you would comment in this thread. I will check your blog regularly.
Post a Comment